Haushila Prasad Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Haushila Prasad Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Petition dismissed as withdrawn; benefits already granted/accrued to the petitioner protected until age of superannuation, subject to satisfactory performance, with termination possible only after due process and opportunity of hearing; case delinked from bunch matters.

Ratio / Principle

The instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, counsel for the petitioner having stated that the petitioner had already been granted the minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000/- with arrears, rendering the petition infructuous.

Key takeaways

As a condition of the disposal, the benefits already granted/accrued to the petitioner shall not be withdrawn till his age of superannuation, subject to satisfactory performance; if he is found not working to the satisfaction of the department or guilty of misconduct etc., his services can be terminated by the respondents after following due process of law and giving him an opportunity of hearing.ratio¶12
The case is to be delinked from bunch matters and shall not be shown in the cause list.¶13

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Service matter (Allahabad High Court, WRIT - A No. 72093 of 2010, Anish Kumar Gupta, J., March 13, 2026): At the stage of final hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had already been granted the minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000/- with arrears, so the petition had become infructuous, and sought its withdrawal. The Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn but directed that the benefits already granted/accrued to the petitioner shall not be withdrawn till his age of superannuation, subject to satisfactory performance; if the petitioner is found not working to the satisfaction of the department or guilty of misconduct etc., his services can be terminated by the respondents after following due process of law and giving an opportunity of hearing. The case was also directed to be delinked from bunch matters and not shown in the cause list. No issue was decided on merits; no statute or precedent was cited.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

WRIT - A No. - 72093 of 2010

Haushila Prasad Yadav

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Others

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Bijendra	Kumar Mishra .....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: C. S. C.,	C.S.C.

Court No. - 39

HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J.

Sri Bijendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the instant case the petitioner has already been granted the minimum pay scale of Rs. 18,000/- with arrears, therefore, the instant petition has become infructuous. Thus, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the instant petition.

Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn .

The benefits already granted/accrued to the petitioner shall not be withdrawn till the age of superannuation of the petitioner herein, subject to his satisfactory performance. If the petitioner is found not working to the satisfaction of the department concerned or is guilty of misconduct etc., his services can be terminated by the respondents after following due process of law and giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner in this regard.

Let this case be delinked from bunch matters and shall not be shown in the cause list.

(Anish Kumar Gupta,J.)

March 13, 2026

n.u.

Digitally signed by :- NASEEM UDDIN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad