Disposed¶8

Radhika Prasad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Engineering Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC28 Jan 2026WRIA/648/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Court No. 7, Hon'ble Justice Manish Mathur; WRIT - A No. - 648 of 2026, decided January 28, 2026. Radhika Prasad v. State Of U.P. (Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Engineering Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others). Hearing held; three weeks' time granted to State Counsel to file counter affidavit; matter relisted in week commencing 23.02.2026. Interim procedural order only - no merits decision, no statutes or cases cited.

What did the court decide?

Three weeks' time granted to learned State Counsel for the opposite parties to file counter affidavit; matter to be listed in week commencing 23.02.2026. ¶8

Radhika Prasad vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Engineering Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 648 of 2026

Radhika Prasad

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Engin Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others	eering	.....Res	pondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pradeep Singh	Kumar	Shukla,	Premnath
Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C.
Court No.- 7

¶7

HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties who prays for and is granted three weeks' time to file counter affidavit.

¶9

List in week commencing 23.02.2026.

¶10

(Manish Mathur,J.)

¶11

January 28, 2026

¶12

kvg/-

¶13

Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Radhika Prasad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Engineering Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Radhika Prasad v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Rural Engineering Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shailendra Nath Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Medical Health and Family Welfare U.P., Lko. and 2 Others

Shailendra Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Secondary Education and 5 Others

Balram Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home U.P. Lko. and Another

Ram Gopal vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko.

Ramzan and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Pappu vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko.