Satendra Kumar Tiwari v. H.R. Head Fresenius Kabi India Pvt. Ltd. and Another
Service dispute of a private-company employee – writ petition under Article 226, Constitution of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench (Court No. 21); WRIT - A No. - 4357 of 2026; decided April 30, 2026 by Hon'ble Manjive Shukla, J. Petitioner Satendra Kumar Tiwari (counsel Rakesh Kumar Singh), an employee of Fresenius Kabi India Pvt. Ltd., filed an Article 226 writ concerning his transfer/service dispute; no one appeared for the petitioner; the court held that a writ petition under Article 226 in respect of any service dispute of an employee of a private company is not maintainable and dismissed the petition. Keywords: Article 226; maintainability; private company employee; service dispute; transfer; Fresenius Kabi India Pvt. Ltd.; Lucknow Bench.
What did the court decide?
A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in respect of any service dispute of an employee of a private company, is not maintainable.