Dismissed¶13
Sapna Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Appointment and Personnel Lko. and 3 Others
Allahabad HCWRIA/3091/2026
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Sapna Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Appointment And Personnel Lko. & 3 Ors., WRIT - A No. 3091 of 2026, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench (Karunesh Singh Pawar, J.), decided March 23, 2026: writ petition dismissed as infructuous because the U.P. Public Service Commission allowed the petitioner's appeal against the impugned order on 20.03.2026; no statute or precedent discussed, no merits decided.
What did the court decide?
Since the petitioner's appeal against the impugned order was allowed by the U.P. Public Service Commission vide order dated 20.03.2026, the present petition had become infructuous and is dismissed as infructuous. ¶13