Rahul Gaur v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Service-law writ petition challenging a suspension order passed by an authority alleged not to be the appointing authority: petitioner (Office Assistant under the respondent-Corporation) suspended by respondent no.3; appointing authority said to be respondent no.4; reliance placed on unnamed Rules at page 70 of the paper book. Respondents 2 to 4 granted time to obtain instructions; matter listed fresh on 2.2.2026; no adjudication on merits. Keywords: suspension; appointing authority; Office Assistant; Corporation; Uttar Pradesh; interim order; adjournment.
What did the court decide?
No relief or interim direction recorded on merits; matter adjourned — counsel for respondent nos.2 to 4 sought time to obtain instructions and the case was directed to be listed on 2.2.2026 as fresh. ¶¶11