Disposed¶14

Rachna Singhal and 11 Others v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC16 Feb 2026WRIA/2253/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Teacher transfer; Government Order dated 14.11.2025; students-teachers ratio; earlier transfer pursuant to order dated 23.05.2025; chaotic situation; interference by High Court; interim status quo; respondent-BSA; State of U.P.; matter posted fresh on 23.02.2026; WRIT - A No. 2253 of 2026; Allahabad High Court; Manju Rani Chauhan, J.

What did the court decide?

Status quo as on date to be maintained by the parties till the next date; matter posted as fresh on 23.02.2026. ¶14

Rachna Singhal and 11 Others vs State of U.P. and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

WRIT - A No. - 2253 of 2026

¶3

Rachna Singhal And 11 Others

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. And 4 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Man Bahadur Singh
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Ashish Kumar Singh, C.S.C.

¶9

Court No. - 52

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the respondent-BSA and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.

¶12

The bunch of petitions dealing with the same issue has already been heard by this Court. This Court is of the considered opinion that, in pursuance of the order dated 23.05.2025, few teachers have already been transferred, pursuant to which they have joined at the transferred place. Therefore there was no occasion for issuance of another Government Order dated 14.11.2025 for transferring number of teachers to maintain students teachers ratio. The issuance of the another Government Order has resulted in a chaotic situation, hence, in these circumstances, interference is required by this Court.

¶13

Let this matter be posted as fresh on 23.02.2026.

¶14

Till then, status quo as on date shall be maintained by the parties.

¶15

February 16, 2026 Imtiyaz

¶16

(Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rachna Singhal and 11 Others v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rachna Singhal and 11 Others v. State of U.P. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Kumar Bharati vs Union of India and 7 Others

Akhilesh Kumar and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Nitin Kumar vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Adila Sharif vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Nand Kishor Chaudhary and 6 Others vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Kaushlesh Kumar Mishra and 5 Others vs State of U.P. and 4 Others