Rajesh Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Panchayati Raj Deptt. Lko. and 4 Others
Service law – arrears of salary, increments and ACP
Case brief
What is this about?
WRIT - A No. 1631 of 2026; Allahabad High Court (Lucknow Bench), Manish Mathur, J., 16.02.2026; Rajesh Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. (Panchayati Raj Deptt.); arrears of salary; increments; ACP; service benefits; dismissal order 27.05.2010 set aside 16.01.2014; service period not counted; representation dated 18.10.2025; fresh representation; District Magistrate Pratapgarh; mandamus; writ disposed of; eight weeks' direction.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No.4 (District Magistrate, Pratapgarh) or any other competent authority; such representation, if filed, to be decided within eight weeks of production of a certified copy of the order. ¶18