Vikas Chand Yadav and 4 Others v. Union of India Thru. Secy,. Health and Family Welfare Nirman Bhawan New Delhi and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Honorarium/salary arrears claim; writ of mandamus; extension of benefit of prior judgment dated 20.03.2024 in Writ A No. 1453 of 2014 (Shiv Pratap Maurya and 667 others v. State of U.P.); grievance held to entail factual aspects; fresh individual representations directed to opposite party no.2 (Principal Secretary, Medical and Family Welfare, Government of Uttar Pradesh, Civil Secretariat, Lucknow) or other competent authority; eight-week decision timeline; certified copy of order to accompany representations; petition finally disposed of; single judge Manish Mathur, J.; Lucknow Bench; February 11, 2026; counsel: Aashish Srivastava for petitioners; Mahendra Kumar Mishra (opp. party No.1), State Counsel (opp. party Nos.2 & 4), Puneet Chandra/Mohit Chandra (opp. party No.3).
What did the court decide?
Liberty to file fresh individual representations before opposite party no.2 or any other competent authority, to be considered and decided within eight weeks along with a certified copy of this order; with these directions the petition was finally disposed of.