Shrawan Kumar Pandey v. State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court considered a writ petition seeking payment of pension, final pension, gratuity, arrears, and other retirement dues, together with a direction to decide the petitioner's representation. Without expressing an opinion on the merits, it disposed of the petition and directed respondent No. 2 to consider and decide the representation lawfully and expeditiously, preferably within twelve weeks from production of a certified copy of the order, after hearing the parties and subject to any legal impediment.
What did the court decide?
Respondent No. 2 was directed to consider and decide the petitioner's representation in accordance with law, expeditiously and preferably within twelve weeks from production of a certified copy of the order, after hearing the parties, provided there was no other legal impediment.