Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution after the petitioner failed to appear. Any interim order previously granted was vacated.
Petition dismissed; interim order vacated
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 12464 of 2013
Smt.Usha Gupta
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Smt.Urmila Shukla And Ors.
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Atul Dayal, Ayush Khanna .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : A.K.Shukla |
Court No. - 35
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution .
Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
September 16, 2026
Arun K. Singh
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt. Usha Gupta
Smt. Urmila Shukla And Ors.
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
