The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition. Any interim order granted earlier stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
WRIT - A No. - 11447 of 2013
Shagufta Parveen And Ors.
.....Petitioner(s)
| Versus | |
|---|---|
| Addl.District Judge And Others | .....Respondent(s) |
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) : |
Akash Jaiswara, Anil Sharma, Shrey Sharma |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) : |
Ashutosh Upadhyay, K.M.Garg |
| Court No.- 35 |
HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
No one appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press this petition.
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution .
Interim order, if any, granted earlier, stands vacated.
(Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.)
September 16, 2026
Arun K. Singh
Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shagufta Parveen And Ors.
Addl. District Judge And Others
Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
