Deepti Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. and 5 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Deepti Yadav v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Secondary Education Lko. and 5 Others, WRIT - A No. 1012 of 2026, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Lucknow Bench), decided February 2, 2026 by Shree Prakash Singh, J. Subject: arrears of salary from 01.04.2017, non-application of annual increment, approx. Rs. 13,000/- per month shortfall, mandamus, secondary education department. Outcome: petition disposed of at admission stage without deciding merits; liberty to file fresh representation before Director of Secondary Education (opposite party no. 2) within 15 days; authority directed to decide within six weeks in accordance with law; notice to opposite party no. 6 dispensed with. No statutes or precedents cited.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 2/Director Secondary Education, Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow within 15 days raising all claims and grounds; upon such representation being moved, the opposite party no. 2 to consider and decide it within a further period of six weeks in accordance with law; notice to opposite party no. 6 dispensed with. Substantive claim for salary arrears/increment not adjudicated on merits.