Tipu Sultan v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In a public interest litigation, a supplementary affidavit filed pursuant to the Court's earlier order was taken on record; respondents' counsel sought time to obtain instructions. The petition was directed to be listed afresh on 17.02.2026.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3835 of 2025
Tipu Sultan
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus State of U.P. and 3 others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Dinesh Kumar Singh, Jagdish Pathak (S.C.)
Chief Justice's Court
HON'BLE ARUN BHANSALI, CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE KSHITIJ SHAILENDRA, J.
- Pursuant to the order passed by the Court, a supplementary affidavit has been filed, copy whereof has been supplied to counsel appearing for the respondents, who prays for time to obtain instructions in the matter.
- Needful may be done before the next date.
- List the petition on 17.02.2026, as fresh.
(Kshitij Shailendra,J.) (Arun Bhansali,CJ.)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Tipu Sultan
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Arun Bhansali
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPIL/3835/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Mahesh Chandra Tripathi Kunal Ravi Singh
- Order 2 — this page · Mahesh Chandra Tripathi Kunal Ravi Singh
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court