Disposed¶14

Ramvriksha Nishad v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC6 May 2026WPIL/3708/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

PIL; encroachment; plot no.593; Banjar land; Village Mohiuddinpur; Tehsil Sadar; District Jaunpur; representation dated 20.08.2025; Section 122B U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950; Section 67A U.P. Revenue Code, 2006; section 123 of the Act of 1950; Form 49Ka notice withdrawn; Tehsildar order dated 07.05.2016; Deputy District Magistrate instruction dated 16.12.2025; Gaon Sabha; infructuous; disposed.

What did the court decide?

In view of the Deputy District Magistrate's instruction showing that the Tehsildar's order dated 07.05.2016 had withdrawn the Form 49Ka notice and vested the land beneath respondent no.6's house in him under Section 67A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006/section 123 of the Act of 1950, no further direction was required to be issued and the PIL was disposed of as having become infructuous. ¶14

Ramvriksha Nishad Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 3708 of 2025

¶3

Ramvriksha Nishad

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

	Versus
State Of U.P. And 5 Others	.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Nimesh Kumar Shukla, Vinod Kumar Tirpathi
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C., Shailendra Kumar Yadav

¶6

Court No. - 55

¶7

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

¶8

Heard Sri Nimesh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Sri Shailendra Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the private respondent no.6. Sri B. K. Tripathi, Advocate has accepted notice on behalf of respondent - Gaon Sabha.

¶9

The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent no.3 to decide representation dated 20.08.2025 filed by the petitioner with a prayer to remove the illegal encroachment made by encroacher/private respondent no.6 over plot no.593 area 0.016 hectare recorded as Banjar in the relevant revenue records relating to Village Mohiuddinpur, Tehsil Sadar, District Jaunpur.

¶10

In pursuance of the direction of this Court, the instruction dated 16.12.2025, sent by the Deputy District Magistrate, Sadar, Jaunpur, has been placed before the Court, which is taken on record.

¶11

Perusal of the aforesaid instruction shows that proceedings under Section 122B of the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 were initiated against the encroacher, however, by the order of the concerned Tehsildar dated 07.05.2016, the notice issued in Form 49Ka has been withdrawn and benefit of Section 67A of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006/section 123 of the Act of 1950 has been given to the respondent no.6, vesting the land beneath his house to him.

¶12

WPIL No. 3708 of 2025

¶13

¶14

In view of the aforesaid, no further direction is required to be issued in the present PIL, which is accordingly disposed of as having become infructuous.

(Arun Kumar,J.)

May 7, 2026

Ashok Kr.

Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ramvriksha Nishad v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramvriksha Nishad v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 8 Others

Shivbabu Vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Praveen Kumar Upadhyay Vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Roop Singh Vs State of U.P. and 17 Others

Daya Shanker Vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 4 Others

Pradeep Kumar Yadav vs State of U.P. and 10 Others