Pawan Kumar Pandey v. State of U.P. and 16 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2232 of 2026 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State. Sri Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, Advocate, has accepted notice on behalf of Gaon
Disposed 2 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 2232 of 2026
Pawan Kumar Pandey
.....Petitioner(s)
| Versus |
|---|
| State Of U.P. And 16 Others | .....Respondent(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Anil Kumar Singh, Raghvendra Tripathi, Rohit Singh |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : C.S.C., Rameshwar Prasad Shukla |
| Court No.- 51 |
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the respondents State. Sri Rameshwar Prasad Shukla, Advocate, has accepted notice on behalf of Gaon Sabha.
- The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to remove the illegal encroachment made by the encroachers over Sabik No.641, Gata No.530, recorded as Banjar (Khalihan) in the revenue records, relating to Mauja Majhauwa, Tehsil Madhuban, District Mau.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPIL/2232/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court