Disposed¶17

Ramsukh v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Allahabad HC14 May 2026WPIL/1251/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Ramsukh v. State of U.P. and 5 Others, PIL No. 1251 of 2026, Allahabad High Court (Arun Kumar, J.), decided 14.05.2026 — alleged encroachment over pond plot in Village Manapur Urf Bagai Kala, District Prayagraj; petition disposed of on maintainability: alternative remedy under Section 67, Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006; relied on Amaruddin Ansari (PIL No. 655 of 2026) and Kanhaiya Lal, 2023 (12) ADJ 226; direction that any Section 67 application be decided after hearing all concerned parties.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; writ petition disposed of on the ground of alternative remedy, with the direction that any application under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006 be decided after hearing all the concerned parties in accordance with law. ¶17

Ramsukh vs State of U.P. and 5 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1251 of 2026

¶3

Ramsukh

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. And 5 Others	.....Respon
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Pramod Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: Azad Rai, C.S.C.

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Court No. - 55

¶9

HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.

¶10

Heard Sri Pramod Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent nos. 1 to 4 and Sri Azad Rai, learned counsel for the respondent no.5.

¶11

The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent nos.2 to 5 to remove the illegal encroachment made by respondent no.6 over Plot No. 191Mi. area 0.4570 and 0.4910 hectare and Plot No.191Mi. area 0.0570 hectare, recorded as Pond, situated in Village Manapur Urf Bagai Kala, Pargana Jhunsi, Tehsil Phoolpur, District Prayagraj.

¶12

Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that petitioner has an alternative remedy to approach appropriate authority by moving an application under Section 67 of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, in view of the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of Amaruddin Ansari Vs. State of U.P. and 5 others , passed in Public Interest Litigation (PIL) No.655 of 2026, decided on 18.03.2026, upholding the Coordinate Bench decision of this Court in the case of Kanhaiya Lal Vs. State of U.P. and others reported in 2023 (12) ADJ 226 .

¶13

Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, this Court is not inclined to entertain the instant petition.

¶14

In case, the petitioner moves an application under Section 67 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006, before appropriate authority, the same shall be decided after hearing all the concerned parties, in accordance with law.

¶15

WPIL No. 1251 of 2026

¶16

¶17

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶18

(Arun Kumar,J.)

¶19

May 14, 2026 Anil

¶20

Digitally signed by :- ANIL KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ramsukh v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramsukh v. State of U.P. and 5 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amrjit vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

Arvind Kumar Singh @ Behosh Jaunpuri vs State of U.P. and 8 Others

Rajesh Pratap Singh vs State of U.P. and 5 Others

Mulmul Ram vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Uma Shankar Rai vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 10 Others

Kulliyatul Banatir Razviya Educational and Welfare Society vs State of U.P. and 5 Others