Mohd. Naved and Others v. Shawaiz Ali Ansari and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Adjournment order in a pending second appeal: the matter was deferred as counsel for the appellants was on sanctioned leave, with directions to relist the appeal.
What the court decided
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
SECOND APPEAL No. - 92 of 2024
Mohd. Naved And Others
.....Appellant(s)
Versus
| Shawaiz Ali Ansari And Others | .....Respo | ndent(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Counsel for Appellant(s) : |
Piyush Chandra Sharma, Pankaj Kum Vinay Kumar Yadav |
Agarwal, ar, Rajesh |
Anand Tiwari, |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) : |
Yogesh Gurnanee, Deepanshu Dass |
Abdul |
Moien, |
Court No. - 20
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
- It has been informed that Mr. Piyush Chandra Agarwal, learned counsel for appellants is on sanctioned leave.
- List the matter in the month of July, 2026.
(Prashant Kumar,J.)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mohd. Naved And Others
- respondent
Shawaiz Ali Ansari And Others
Coram
Prashant Kumar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- SAPL/92/2024
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court