Amod Kumar v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9730 of 2026

Amod Kumar

.....Applicant(s)

Versus
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) :	Pankaj Kumar Mishra
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :	G.A.

Court No. - 72

HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 25 of 2026, under Sections 69, 352, 351(2), 115(2) BNS, Police Station Jasrana, District Firozabad with a prayer to grant him anticipatory bail.

1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case; he has nothing to do with the alleged offence in spite of that the police are trying to arrest the applicant. It is further contended by the learned counsel that a false and frivolous first information report was lodged by the informant-victim, wherein she alleged that she was subjected to rape on the false promise of marriage. It is admitted case of the victim that she was a major girl, about 21 years of age and that she had been in touch with the applicant for a prolong period and during this period they enjoyed a consensual relationship. It is next submitted that the FIR is a result of broken relationship and the same was lodged when the relationship turned sour between them. The version of the victim kept changing and does not inspire much confidence to prosecution case. It is further submitted that the victim was a married lady and her marriage was solemnized with one Mithilesh Kumar, however, the divorce took place between them. It is alleged that the applicant promised to marry the