Smt. Preeti @ Ruby v. State of U.P. and Another

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9725 of 2026

Smt. Preeti @ Ruby

	Versus	....	.Applicant(s)
State of U.P. and Another			.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)		: Mukesh	Joshi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)		: G.A.

Court No. - 72

HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 126 of 2026, under Sections 85, 80(2) BNS, Police Station Civil Lines, District Rampur with a prayer to grant her anticipatory bail.

1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. She has nothing to do with the alleged offence in spite of that the police are trying to arrest the applicant. The applicant is aunt (chachi) of the husband of the deceased. The first information report was lodged against the applicant, real mother-inlaw and husband of the deceased. The deceased and her husband solemnized a love marriage against wishes of the first informant. The deceased and her husband filed Writ C No. 3789 of 2023 against the present informant, which was disposed of vide order dated 3.2.2023 and the respondents were directed not to interfere in the peaceful married life of the petitioners. It is further submitted that the deceased died unnatural death. No injury was noticed on the body of the deceased in her postmortem report. Cause of death could not be ascertained, hence viscera was preserved for chemical analysis. As per viscera report, no poisonous substance was found in the body of the deceased. The applicant being mother-in-law (chachiya saas) has no concern with the matrimonial life of the deceased and her husband. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled in the first information report. False