The applicant sought anticipatory bail in a criminal case, but counsel requested withdrawal of the application at that stage. The High Court dismissed it as not pressed while reserving liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application if required.
Liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application at the appropriate stage, if required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9720 of 2026
Shahjadi @ Gudiya
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And Another
.....Opposite Party(s)
| Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s) |
: Gaytri Rajput, Indra Pal Singh Rajpoot : G.A. |
|---|
Court No. - 72
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
(Vivek Kumar Singh,J.)
September 18, 2026
Lalit Shukla
Digitally signed by :- LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a fresh application at the appropriate stage.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shahjadi @ Gudiya
State Of U.P. And Another
Vivek Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
