Pappu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC.…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9683 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Shri Bharat Singh, Learned counsel for the informant has pointed out that the applicant has a criminal history of one case being Case Crime
Disposed 2 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9683 of 2026
Pappu
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
| State of U.P. | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Sarve Nazir, Zafar Abbas |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
- Shri Bharat Singh, Learned counsel for the informant has pointed out that the applicant has a criminal history of one case being Case Crime No.141/2026 in which the wife of the applicant had applied for anticipatory bail before this Court. The applicant has not disclosed this fact in affidavit filed before this Court and a declaration has been made that the applicant has no other criminal history.
- On being confronted with this fact, learned counsel for the applicant prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with the liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application after disclosing the complete criminal antecedents of the applicant, as required under Chapter XVIII, Rule 18(7) of the Rules of the Court.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- NABAIL/9683/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court