Amarnath v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9664 of 2026

Amarnath .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhinav Singh, Ajeet Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 71

HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.

1. Heard Learned counsel for the applicant; and the Learned A.G.A. for the State.

1. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.110 of 2026, under Sections 109(1), 115(2), 131, 351(2) BNS, Police Station- Nakur, District Saharanpur, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehends his arrest in the above-mentioned case.

1. Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that although the applicant is named in the First Information Report (FIR), however, his implication is absolutely false. Injured had received injuries in a road traffic accident, but a false case of assault was manufactured and FIR was lodged on the next day.

1. Learned counsel has further submitted that in the initial medical examination, no grievous injury or any injury which could be categorized as dangerous to life was found. On an application moved before the District Magistrate, a fresh medical examination was conducted after more than one month of the incident, in which grievous injuries were noted on the head of the injured Rajbir. Co-accused Rishipal, who is the father of the applicant, and co-accused Rishabh, who is the son of the applicant, have all been implicated due to previous enmity and they have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in NABAIL Nos.9379 of 2026 and 9573 of 2026 respectively. The case of the applicant stands on a