Veeresh v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9646 of 2026

Veeresh

		.....Ap	plicant(s)
	Versus
State of U.P.		....	.Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Ambrish Chandra Kumar Tripathi	Pandey,	Pramod
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 72

HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.0099 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1) B.N.S., Police Station Chandaus, District Aligarh, with a prayer to grant him anticipatory bail.

1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the alleged offence; in spite of that, the police are trying to arrest him. The alleged incident is said to have taken place on 04.05.2026 at 17:00 hours, whereas the FIR was lodged on 07.05.2026 at 17:30 hours. The delay in lodging the FIR has not been properly explained by the prosecution. In fact, this is a cross-case, and from the side of the applicant, an FIR was lodged on 05.05.2026. The applicant also sustained injuries in the incident. In the FIR dated 07.05.2026, general and vague allegations have been levelled against the applicant and other co-accused. It is alleged that three persons sustained injuries, including injured Suresh. The injuries of the other two injured persons are simple in nature, and as per the injury report of injured Suresh, a displaced fracture of the squamous part of the left temporal bone was noticed. In fact, the applicant has not caused the injury, and it is not alleged that the applicant was the author of that injury. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit. Learned counsel for the applicant further