Suhail v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC.…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9593 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard, Learned counsel for the applicant, the Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application
Disposed 4 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9593 of 2026
Suhail
.....Applicant(s) Versus
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Javed Alam |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
- Heard, Learned counsel for the applicant, the Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
- The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.288 of 2026, under Sections 109, 115(2), 351(3) and 85 BNS, Police Station- Hapur Nagar, District Hapur, with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail as the applicant apprehends his arrest in the above-mentioned case.
- Learned counsel for the applicant has contended that the applicant is the husband of the victim and that the FIR has been lodged by his brotherin-law. General allegations have been made in the FIR that the applicant and the co-accused, Ehtesham, tried to strangulate the victim using a 'dupatta' and also assaulted her.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- NABAIL/9593/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court