Smt Reena v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC.…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9271 of 2026 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard Sri Akhil Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Narendra Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Kumar Dubey, Advocate holding brief
Disposed 14 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9271 of 2026
Smt Reena
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Narendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Ravindra Singh
Court No. - 72
HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
- Heard Sri Akhil Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Sri Narendra Kumar, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Ram Kumar Dubey, Advocate holding brief of Sri Ravindra Singh, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
- The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 192 of 2026, under Section108 of B.N.S. and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Dhanari, District Sambhal, with a prayer to grant her anticipatory bail.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- NABAIL/9271/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court