Farman and Another v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC.…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9237 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard, Learned counsel for the applicants, the Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application
Disposed 12 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 9237 of 2026
| Farman And Another | Versus | .....Applicant(s) |
|---|---|---|
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : | Saif Ullah, Sudhakar Yadav |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : | G.A. |
Court No. - 71
HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.
- Heard, Learned counsel for the applicants, the Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
- The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants in Case Crime No.111 of 2026, under Sections 110, 115(2), 351(3), 352, 3(5) BNS, Police Station- Chandausi, District Sambhal, with a prayer to enlarge them on anticipatory bail as the applicants apprehend their arrest in the above-mentioned case.
- Learned counsel for the applicants has contended that although the applicants have been named in the FIR, only a general role has been assigned to them. The two injured persons have received two injuries each, and none of the injuries has been opined to be grievous in nature or dangerous to life. The applicants have no criminal antecedents.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- NABAIL/9237/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court