Smt. Alsaba @ Saba Parveen v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 8628 of 2026

Smt. Alsaba @ Saba Parveen

.....Applicant(s)

	Versus
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Maneesh Tiwari, Pawan Kumar Shukla
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

Court No. - 72

HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

1. The present application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No.786 of 2025, under Sections 111(1), 318(4), 115(2), 351(2), 308(5) B.N.S., Police Station - Civil Lines, District Moradabad, with a prayer to grant her anticipatory bail.

1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. She has nothing to do with the alleged offence, in spite of which the police are trying to arrest her. The alleged incident is said to have taken place on 11.04.2025, whereas the FIR was lodged after a very long delay on 09.10.2025. In fact, the present FIR dated 09.10.2025 was lodged as a counterblast to the earlier FIR dated 24.09.2025, lodged by the present applicant against the husband of the informant of the FIR dated 09.10.2025. The applicant is a lady and has no criminal antecedent to her credit. The other co-accused has been enlarged on regular bail by a Coordinate Bench of this Court. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant undertakes to cooperate during investigation and trial and shall appear as and when required by the Investigating Agency or the Court concerned. It has also been stated that, in case the applicant is granted anticipatory bail, she shall not misuse the liberty of bail, shall cooperate with the investigation, and shall abide by all the conditions that may be imposed by the Court.