Faizan Alvi vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2026)

Faizan Alvi vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Interim anticipatory bail granted: in the event of arrest, the applicant Faizan Alvi to be released forthwith in Case Crime No. 32 of 2026 on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, subject to stated conditions, till the next date of listing (16.04.2026); application to be listed fresh.

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant Faizan Alvi is entitled to anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 32 of 2026 under Sections 69, 89, 115(2), 351(3), 361(2) of B.N.S. 2023, Police Station T.P. Nagar, District Meerut.

Court's answer

Till the next date of listing, in the event of the arrest of the applicant Faizan Alvi, he shall be released forthwith on interim anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 32 of 2026.

Ratio / Principle

The interim anticipatory bail is to be on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned.

Key takeaways

The interim anticipatory bail is subject to conditions: the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts; shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; and shall not pressurize or intimidate the prosecution witness.ratio¶14

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Anticipatory bail — S. 482 BNSS — High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.), order dated April 6, 2026: interim anticipatory bail granted to applicant Faizan Alvi in Case Crime No. 32 of 2026 (Sections 69, 89, 115(2), 351(3), 361(2) of B.N.S. 2023, P.S. T.P. Nagar, District Meerut) — in the event of arrest, release forthwith on personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer/Court concerned, subject to conditions (availability for interrogation; no inducement, threat or promise; no departure from India without previous permission of the Court; no pressurizing/intimidating the prosecution witness). Interim protection operates till 16.04.2026, fixed for informant's counsel to obtain instructions; vakalatnama of informant's counsel taken on record.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 3236 of 2026

Faizan Alvi

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P. and Another

	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Dr. Rajesh Kumar Srivastav
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

Court No. - 72

HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J.

Vakalatnama filed by Sri Shubham Prakash Gupta, Learned Advocate, on behalf of the informant today in Court, is taken on the record.

He prays for and is granted ten days' time to obtain necessary instructions in the matter.

Put up as fresh on 16.04.2026 to enable the Learned counsel for the informant to obtain necessary instructions in the matter.

Till the next date of listing, in the event of the arrest of the applicantFaizan Alvi , he shall be released forthwith in Case Crime No.32 of 2026, under Sections 69, 89, 115(2), 351(3), 361(2) of B.N.S. 2023, Police Station- T.P. Nagar, District- Meerut, on interim anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned with the following conditions:-

i. the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

ii. that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

NABAIL No. 3236 of 2026

2

iii. that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court;

iv. that the applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness.

(Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.)

April 6, 2026

Sachin

Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad