Disposed¶11

Mohd Firoj v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Mar 2026NABAIL/2737/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail; interim anticipatory bail; S. 482 BNSS; S. 108 BNS; Crime No. 1400 of 2025; Police Station South, District Firozabad; Mohd Firoj v. State of U.P.; NABAIL No. 2737 of 2026; personal bond and two sureties; bail conditions (interrogation, no inducement/threat, no leaving India, no witness intimidation); cancellation on breach; A.G.A. no instructions; listed fresh 06.04.2026; Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.; decided 20.03.2026.

What did the court decide?

Interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant Mohd. Firoj till 06.04.2026, in the event of arrest, on a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer/Court concerned, subject to stated conditions; the learned A.G.A. having no instructions, the application is to be put up as fresh on 06.04.2026 (final decision deferred).

Mohd Firoj vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶11

Issue for consideration

Whether the applicant Mohd Firoj, involved in Crime No.1400 of 2025 under Section 108 of the B.N.S., Police Station South, District Firozabad, should be released on interim anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest, pending disposal of the application.

¶11

Court's answer

Till 06.04.2026, in the event of the arrest of the applicant Mohd. Firoj, he is to be released on interim anticipatory bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned.

¶11

Ratio / Principle

The interim anticipatory bail is subject to conditions: the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required; shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts so as to dissuade disclosure to the Court or police; shall not leave India without previous permission of the Court; and shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness.

¶12

Key takeaways

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the interim anticipatory bail of the applicant.ratio¶18

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Hon'ble Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.), Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No. 2737 of 2026, Mohd Firoj v. State of U.P., decided March 20, 2026: The learned A.G.A. stated he had not received instructions. The Court granted interim anticipatory bail till 06.04.2026 to the applicant, who is involved in Crime No.1400 of 2025 under Section 108 of the B.N.S., Police Station South, District Firozabad, in the event of his arrest, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station/Court concerned, subject to conditions (availability for interrogation; no inducement, threat or promise to witnesses/persons acquainted with the facts; no leaving India without previous permission of the Court; no pressurizing/intimidating prosecution witnesses), with liberty to the Court concerned to cancel the interim anticipatory bail on breach of any condition. The matter was ordered to be put up as fresh on 06.04.2026.

Mohd Firoj v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohd Firoj v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shiv Singh vs State of U.P.

Rahul Jain vs State of U.P.

Surendra @ Baba Lahri vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shivansh Pandey @ Shivank Pandey vs State of U.P.

Mohit @ Kush Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Jeeshan @ Shanu @ Mohd Dishan vs State of U.P. and Another