Rani vs State of U.P.

2. Present application has been moved seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 642 of 2024, under Sections 110, 115(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 324(2), 351(3), 352 B.N.S., Police Station Roza, District Shahjahanpur with the prayer that in the event of arrest, applicant may be released on bail.

¶12

3. At the very outset, learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received any instructions as yet.

¶13

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and she has an apprehension that she may be arrested in the above-mentioned case. He further submits that no offence is made out against the applicant and no specific role has been assigned to her and none of the injuries of the injured has been found to be dangerous to life. It is further submitted that specific role of assault by fire arm has been assigned to co-accused Rajesh and role of assault by sharp edged weapon has been assigned to co-accused Subhash and 08 other persons have been assigned the general role of assault by hard and blunt object. It was also submitted that applicant undertakes to co-operate during trial and she would appear as and when required by the investigating agency or Court. It has been stated that in case applicant is granted anticipatory bail, she shall not misuse the

¶14

NABAIL No. 1702 of 2026

¶15

2

¶16

liberty of bail and will co-operate with the investigation and would obey all conditions of bail.

¶17

5. Specific role of assault by fire arm has been assigned to co-accused Rajesh and role of assault by sharp edged weapon has been assigned to co-accused Subhash and 08 other persons have been assigned the general role of assault by hard and blunt object and no specific role has been assigned to the applicant.

¶18

6. It may be stated that in case of Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre v. State of Maharashtra , (2011) 1 SCC 694, it has been held by Hon'ble Supreme Court that while deciding anticipatory bail, the Court must consider nature and gravity of accusation, antecedent of accused, possibility of accused to flee from justice and that Court must evaluate entire available material against the accused carefully and that the exact role of the accused has also to be taken into consideration.

¶19

7. Considering the above submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant and without expressing any opinion on merits, the applicant- Rani involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on interim anticipatory bail on her furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned till 1.4.2026 with the following conditions :-

¶20

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence and that she would appear before the trial Court on the date fixed unless exempted by the Court concerned;

¶21

(ii) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her/them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;

¶22

(iii) The applicant would cooperate during trial and would not misuse the liberty of interim interim anticipatory bail bail.

¶23

(iv) The applicant shall not leave India without prior permission of the Court concerned.

¶24

NABAIL No. 1702 of 2026

¶25

3

¶26

8. In default of any of the conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of interim anticipatory bail granted to the applicant herein.

¶27

9. List this case as fresh on 1.4.2026.

¶28

10. In the meantime, learned AGA may obtain instructions in the matter.

¶29

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶30

February 19, 2026

¶31

Abhishek

¶32

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rani v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rani v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shayroon and Another vs State of U.P.

Manager @ Arshad vs State of U.P.

Tavish vs State of U.P.

Soni vs State of U.P. and Another

Kamlesh Yadav @ Karua vs State of U.P.

Chhotu @ Riyaz Ali vs State of U.P.