Dismissed¶11

Sikander v. State of U.P.

Anticipatory bail – application under Section 482 BNSS

Allahabad HC14 Jan 2026NABAIL/10705/2025

Download

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sikander v. State of U.P., Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10705 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Court No. 72), decided January 14, 2026 by Jitendra Kumar Sinha, J. Appearance: Sri Suraj Upadhyay holding brief of Sri Vivek Singh for the applicant; Sri B.P. Maurya, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondents. Application withdrawn as infructuous and dismissed; no issue decided on merits; no cases cited; administrative direction to return certified copies of annexures.

What did the court decide?

No relief on merits; application dismissed as infructuous on withdrawal, with a direction to return certified copies of annexures to the applicant. ¶11

Sikander vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10705 of 2025

Sikander

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Vivek Singh
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶7

Court No. - 72

¶8

HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

¶9

Sri Suraj Upadhyay, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Vivek Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri B.P. Maurya, learned A.G.A. for the Staterespondents are present.

¶10

At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant seeks permission to withdraw the present application as the same has become infructuous.

¶11

In view of above, the present application stands dismissed as having become infructuous.

¶12

Office is directed to return the certified copies of the annexures to the applicant at the earliest after retaining photocopies of the same on record as per rules.

¶13

(Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.)

¶14

January 14, 2026

¶15

Madhurima

¶16

Digitally signed by :- MADHURIMA GARG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sikander v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sikander v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Tiwari vs State of U.P. and Another

Kunal Yadav vs State of U.P.

Babli Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Danish Alias Alex and Another vs State of U.P. and Another

Ankit Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another

Majid vs State of U.P.