Iqram Maulana and Another vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Iqram Maulana and Another vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Interim relief only: till the next date of listing, further proceedings of Criminal Case No. 6969 of 2025 and the summoning order dated 31.11.2025 shall remain stayed against the applicants; matter to be put up as fresh on 10.04.2026; Office directed to seek comments regarding the filing of the charge-sheet. Final disposal of the application deferred.

Issue for consideration

Whether further proceedings in Criminal Case No. 6969 of 2025 (arising out of Case Crime No. 0077 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333 and 110 BNS) and the summoning order dated 31.11.2025 should be interfered with, given that the FIR was earlier quashed by a Division Bench of this Court and the parties have settled their dispute.

Court's answer

Prima facie, the matter requires consideration.

Ratio / Principle

As an interim measure, till the next date of listing, further proceedings of Criminal Case No. 6969 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No. 0077 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333 and 110 BNS, Police Station Hajratnagar Garhi, District Sambhal, as well as the summoning order dated 31.11.2025, shall remain stayed against the applicants.

Key takeaways

Office is directed to seek comments from the court concerned and explain as to when the charge-sheet has been filed by the Investigating Officer before the court concerned.ratio¶12

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.), interim order in Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 7274 of 2026, Iqram Maulana and another v. State of U.P. and others (decided 12.03.2026): Learned counsel for both parties jointly submitted that a Division Bench of the Court had quashed the FIR of Case Crime No. 77 of 2025 vide order dated 29.07.2025, that a charge-sheet had nonetheless been filed, and that the parties had settled their dispute. Holding that prima facie the matter requires consideration, the Court stayed, till the next date of listing, further proceedings of Criminal Case No. 6969 of 2025 (arising out of Case Crime No. 0077 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333 and 110 BNS, Police Station Hajratnagar Garhi, District Sambhal) as well as the summoning order dated 31.11.2025, pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division)/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal, against the applicants. Office was directed to seek comments from the court concerned on when the charge-sheet was filed; matter listed fresh on 10.04.2026.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 7274 of 2026

Iqram Maulana And Another

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 2 Others

.....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Irshad Ahmad
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

Court No. - 74

HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

Learned counsel for both parties jointly submit that a Division Bench of this court quashed the FIR of Case Crime No. 77 of 2025 vide order dated 29.07.2025.

Office is directed to seek comments from the court concerned and explain as to when the charge-sheet has been filed by the Investigating Officer before the court concerned.

It is further submitted that both the parties have settled their dispute.

Prima facie matter requires consideration.

Put up as fresh on 10.04.2026.

Till the next date of listing, further proceedings of Criminal Case No. 6969 of 2025, arising out of Case Crime No. 0077 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 333 and 110 BNS, Police StationHajratnagar Garhi, District- Sambhal as well as summoning order dated 31.11.2025, pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division)/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal, shall remain stayed against the applicants.

(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)

March 12, 2026 Prashant D.

Digitally signed by :- PRASHANT DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad