Parvez and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 4 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
Quashing application under Section 528 BNSS rejected; inherent powers under Sections 482 Cr.P.C. not exercisable to interfere with a sessions trial after filing of charge-sheet, framing of charges and recording of witness statements; murder case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1), 351(3); Case Crime No. 194 of 2024, Police Station Mandhata, District Pratapgarh; Session Trial No. 249 of 2026 before District and Sessions Judge, Pratapgarh; plea of alibi and CCTV footage; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Brij Raj Singh, J.; decided February 17, 2026.
What did the court decide?
Having regard to the filing of the charge-sheet, the framing of charges against the applicants and the recording of statements of some witnesses, the Court held that it could not interfere with the proceedings while exercising its inherent powers under Sections 482 Cr.P.C.