Disposed¶15

Amit Kumar and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC16 Feb 2026NA528/527/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Amit Kumar And 2 Others v. State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko.; Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 527 of 2026; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench, Court No. 12; Pankaj Bhatia, J.; decided 16-02-2026; compromise deed Annexure No.5; verification before trial court on 23-02-2026; interim protection - no coercive steps pursuant to FIR No. 0374 of 2024, P.S. Satrikh, District Barabanki; next listing 10-03-2026; counsel Prince Verma, Surya Deo Sharma; G.A.

What did the court decide?

Interim relief granted (final decision deferred): no coercive steps against the applicants pursuant to FIR No.0374 of 2024, P.S. Satrikh, District Barabanki, till the next date of listing (10.03.2026); trial-court verification of the compromise deed ordered for 23.02.2026 with a report to be sent to this court. ¶15

Amit Kumar and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶15

Issue for consideration

Whether coercive action pursuant to FIR No.0374 of 2024, P.S. Satrikh, District Barabanki, should be held in abeyance in view of the compromise reached between the parties, pending verification of the compromise deed by the trial court.

¶15

Court's answer

In view of the reported compromise, the court directed the parties to appear before the trial court with the compromise deed for its verification on 23.02.2026, and required the trial court to send a report to this court by the next date.

¶12

Ratio / Principle

The court granted interim protection: till the next date of listing (10.03.2026), no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants pursuant to FIR No.0374 of 2024, P.S. Satrikh, District Barabanki.

¶15

Key takeaways

The original compromise deed, if any, was directed to be returned to the counsel for the applicant on his moving an appropriate application, a photocopy being retained on record for verification before the trial court.ratio¶14

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Application U/S 528 BNSS No. - 527 of 2026 (Amit Kumar And 2 Others v. State Of U.P.), High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 12, decided by Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia, J. on February 16, 2026. Counsel for the parties stated that the matter arising out of FIR No.0374 of 2024, P.S. Satrikh, District Barabanki, has been compromised and the compromise deed is on record as Annexure No.5. The court directed the parties to appear before the trial court for verification of the compromise deed on 23.02.2026, with a report to be sent to the High Court by the next date; the original deed is to be returned to the applicants' counsel (photocopy retained) for verification. As an interim measure, no coercive steps pursuant to the said FIR shall be taken till the next date of listing on 10.03.2026.

Amit Kumar and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Kumar and 2 Others v. State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Meera Devi vs State of U.P. Thru. District Magistrate, Gonda and Others

Ram Karan and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Revenue, Lko. and Another

Himanshu Sharma and Another vs Rakesh Kumar and 6 Others

Bal Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 4 Others

Jitendra Pratap Verma and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko. and 2 Others

Ram Kumar Prajapati vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. (Home) Lko. and Another