Manoj Maheshwari and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC4 May 2026NA528/51556/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Samit Gopal, J.; Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 51556 of 2025; Manoj Maheshwari, Chhote Dixit, Pintulal vs State of U.P.; quashing of complaint case; Complaint Case No. 22 of 2024; Rammoorat; summoning order dated 13.11.2025; sections 323, 504, 506 IPC; section 3(1)(da) SC/ST Act; Special Judge (SC/ST Act) Jalaun at Orai; prayer not pressed; direction for expeditious disposal of bail application on surrender; application disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the trial court that if the accused-applicants surrender and apply for bail, the bail application shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law; the prayer for quashing and staying the proceedings was dismissed as not pressed. ¶¶17

Manoj Maheshwari and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 51556 of 2025

¶2

Manoj Maheshwari And 2 Others

¶3

.....Applicant(s)

¶4

Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rakesh Kumar Mathur Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Baikunth Nath Singh, G.A., Manish Kumar Singh

¶5

Court No. - 75

¶6

HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.

¶7

1. List revised.

¶8

Heard Sri Rakesh Kumar Mathur, learned counsel for the applicant(s), Sri Manish Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and Sri Birendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the State and perused the record.

¶9

This application under Section 528 BNSS has been filed by the applicant(s) Manoj Maheshwari, Chhote Dixit and Pintulal, with the prayers to quash the entire proceeding of Complaint Case No. 22 of 2024 (Rammoorat Vs. Manoj Maheshwari and others) as well as summoning order dated 13.11.2025 passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Jalaun at Orai, under sections 323, 504, 506 IPC and section 3(1)(da) (dha) of SC/ST Act, pending in the said court and with a further prayer to stay the entire proceeding of the aforesaid case, during the pendency of the present application.

¶10

After arguments at length, learned counsel for the applicant(s) states that the purpose of the applicant(s) would suffice if an order is passed directing the trial court to decide the bail application of the applicant(s), as expeditiously as possible. He further states that although the prayer has been made for quashing and staying the proceedings of the aforesaid case but he does not press the same.

¶11

Learned counsel for the State has no objection of aforesaid arguments of learned counsel for the applicant(s).

¶12

In view of the above, the prayer for quashing and staying the further proceedings of the aforesaid case is dismissed as not pressed.

¶13

However, in view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case

¶14

NA528 No. 51556 of 2025

¶15

¶16

and looking to the limited prayer of learned counsel for the applicant(s), it is directed that if the accused-applicant(s) surrenders before the trial court and apply for bail, the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶17

The present application is disposed of.

¶18

(Samit Gopal,J.)

¶19

May 5, 2026 M. ARIF

¶20

Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Manoj Maheshwari and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Maheshwari and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rizwan vs State of U.P. and Another

Muskan Khan and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shakeel @ Shakeel Ahmad and 6 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Rahul Yadav and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Premchand Maurya Vs State of U.P through Its Principal Secretary (Home) and Another

Rajpal Singh and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another