Vinod and 7 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Section 528 BNSS application; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad; Court No. 80; Rajiv Lochan Shukla, J.; applicants Vinod and 7 others (eight accused persons) versus State of U.P. and another; A.G.A. objection that compromise executed and verified for seven accused persons and three opposite parties including informant and injured; applicant No.5 Bhima son of Genda Singh @ Genda Lal not a signatory to compromise; counsel prayed for time to verify facts and file documents; matter put up as fresh on 19.1.2026; interim adjournment, no merits decided; counsel: Brij Bhushan Upadhyay, Amit Kumar Malviya, Rishikesh Malviya, Devesh Nath Tiwari (A.G.A.).
What did the court decide?
Interim direction only: matter put up as fresh on 19.1.2026 to enable learned counsel for the applicants to bring on record the relevant documents with respect to applicant No.5; no final determination made at this stage.