Dismissed¶14

Sanjay Kumar Patel v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC4 May 2026NA528/41932/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court, Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 41932 of 2025, Sanjay Kumar Patel v. State of U.P. and 3 others (decided May 5, 2026, Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.). Section 528 BNSS quashing petition against entire proceedings of Special Case No. 893 of 2023 / case crime No. 71 of 2022 (Sections 506, 354-A IPC and Section 7/8 POCSO Act, P.S. Manduadeeh, District Varanasi) and cognizance/summoning order dated 24.11.2023 of Special Judge (POCSO Act), Court No. 2, Varanasi. Dismissed as not pressed with liberty to approach the competent court; no merits adjudicated; no precedents discussed.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to file appropriate application/bail application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction. ¶14

Sanjay Kumar Patel Vs State of U.P. and 3… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41932 of 2025

Sanjay Kumar Patel

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. And 3 Others

¶7

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Mohd. Kamar Shah Alam
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A., Suraj Kumar Singh

¶9

Court No. - 76

¶10

HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

¶11

Sri Niyaz Ahmad, Advocate holding brief of Shri Mohd. Kamar Shah Alam, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri A.K. Rai, learned A.G.A. for the State, Shri Ayush Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Shri Suraj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the opposite party No. 2 and perused the material on record.

¶12

The present application under Section 528 of Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed by the applicant to quash the entire proceedings of Special Case No. 893 of 2023, arising out of case crime No. 71 of 2022, under Sections 506, 354-A, I.P.C. and Section 7/8 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, Police Station- Manduadeeh, District Varanasi as well as cognizance/summoning order dated 24.11.2023, pending in the court of Special Judge (POCSO Act), Court No. 2, Varanasi.

¶13

After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this application and wants liberty to file appropriate application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction.

¶14

The instant application is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file appropriate application/bail application/proceedings before the court of competent jurisdiction.

¶15

Office shall return the certified copy of the documents to the learned counsel for the applicant, after retaining a xerox of the same.

¶16

May 5, 2026 T. Sinha

¶17

(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sanjay Kumar Patel v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Kumar Patel v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Kumar and Another vs State of Up

Saniya and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt Madhuri Devi and Another vs State of Up and 5 Others

Rajan Singh @ Harish Singh and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashok Dangi Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ashok Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others