Disposed¶16

Faheem v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Allahabad HC9 Feb 2026NA528/407/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 528 BNSS; single/common personal bond and two sureties accepted across four cases; applicant granted bail in four cases unable to furnish separate bail bonds; direction to trial court to release applicant on bail; reliance on Supreme Court order dated 29.10.2018 in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P., Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.8914-8915 of 2018; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench; Brij Raj Singh, J.; February 9, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Trial court directed to accept one personal bond and two sureties to its satisfaction in all four cases mentioned in paragraph-3 of the application and to release the applicant on bail. ¶16

Faheem vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 407 of 2026

Faheem

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.		....	.Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prashant Dwivedi	Pandey,	Manoj	Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No.- 16

¶7

HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶9

The present application under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. has been filed seeking a direction to the court concerned to accept a personal bond and two sureties in all four cases mentioned in paragraph-3 of the memo of application.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is involved in four cases and has been granted bail, but he is unable to provide separate bail bonds and sureties in all cases. He, therefore, prays that trial court may be directed to accept the same bail bond and sureties in all four cases mentioned in paragraph-3 of the memo of application. In support of his submission, he has placed reliance upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.8914-8915 of 2018, Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P., dated 29.10.2018 to establish that the Supreme Court in the aforesaid case has directed to accept one personal bond and two sureties for all cases.

¶11

Learned AGA does not dispute the aforesaid legal proposition.

¶12

Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the dictum of the Supreme Court in this regard, the trial court is directed to accept one personal bond and two sureties to its satisfaction in all four cases

¶13

NA528 No. 407 of 2026

¶14

¶15

mentioned in paragraph-3 of the application and release the applicant on bail.

¶16