Satpal v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38181 of 2026 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for State. 2. The instant application has been preferred for seeking quashing of non- bailable warrant dated 11.11.2025 passed
Disposed 9 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38181 of 2026
Satpal
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P. and Another
| .....Opposite Party(s) |
|
|---|---|
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Amar Jeet Upadhyay |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
| Court No.- 79 |
HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
- Heard learned counsel for applicant and learned AGA for State.
- The instant application has been preferred for seeking quashing of nonbailable warrant dated 11.11.2025 passed by learned Additional District and Session Judge, Court No.5, Ghaziabad in Session Trial No.1467 of 2014 (State of U.P. vs. Satpal) under sections 392, 397, 411 IPC, arising out of Case Crime No.129 of 2014, P.S. Modi Nagar, District- Ghaziabad.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/38181/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court