Vinoda Devi and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38042 of 2026 Court No. - 79 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for parties. 2. Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the chargesheet dated 5.8.2023 and cognizance/summoning order dated
Disposed 11 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 38042 of 2026
Vinoda Devi And 3 Others
| Versus .....Applicant(s) |
|
|---|---|
| State of U.P. and Another | .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Applicant(s) | : Rakesh Kumar Singh, Ravendra Singh |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 79
HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.
- Heard learned counsel for parties.
- Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash the chargesheet dated 5.8.2023 and cognizance/summoning order dated 20.8.2025 passed by learned Judicial Magistrate-IV, Prayagraj as well as entire proceedings of Case no. 345 of 2025 (State of U.P. vs. Vinoda Devi and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 0084 of 2023, under Sections 325, 323, 504 IPC, P.S.- Phoolpur, District Prayagraj.
- On perusal of the narration of FIR as well as impugned order and chargesheet, this Court does not find it to be a case where interference of this Court is required. No such ground appears to be available in the present application, on the basis of which, impugned order, chargesheet and entire proceeding, can be set aside.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/38042/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court