Avneesh Kumar Yadav and Another v. State of Up and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37881 of 2026 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the prayer to
Disposed 10 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 37881 of 2026
Avneesh Kumar Yadav And Another
.....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Surendra Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 83
HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J.
- Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
- The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with the prayer to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 909 of 2025 (State of U.P. Vs. Avneesh Kumar Yadav and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 104 of 2022, under Sections 498-A, 504, 506 of IPC and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station- Gaura Badshahpur, DistrictJaunpur, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate Second, District Jaunpur.
- Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have amicably settled their dispute out of the Court. Applicants approached this Court by filing Application under Section 528 BNSS No.10249 of 2026 with prayer to quash the proceedings in terms of compromise entered between the parties and this Court vide order dated 13.04.2026 directed the parties to appear before the trial court for verification of the parties and compromise application. Trial court vide order dated 18.06.2026 verified the parties as well as compromise application. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have settled their dispute through compromise and, as such, opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicants. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- NA528/37881/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court