Disposed¶20

Shailu @ Shailendra and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC5 Feb 2026NA528/3432/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 3432 of 2026; Shailu @ Shailendra v. State of U.P.; Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J.; 05.02.2026; compromise dated 04.09.2025; Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 IPC; Case Crime No. 420 of 2021; Case No. 37732 of 2024; PS Sikandara, District Agra; interim stay of trial proceedings pending verification of compromise; verification within four weeks; supplementary affidavit; listed 22.05.2026; quashing application based on compromise; interlocutory order.

What did the court decide?

Interim relief: further proceedings of Case No. 37732 of 2024 (Case Crime No. 420 of 2021, PS Sikandara, District Agra) stayed against the applicants until further orders, subject to verification of the compromise dated 04.09.2025; matter listed fresh on 22.05.2026. Application not finally decided. ¶20

Shailu @ Shailendra and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶20

Issue for consideration

Whether, in view of the compromise dated 04.09.2025 between the parties, further proceedings in Case No. 37732 of 2024 (arising out of Case Crime No. 420 of 2021, Police Station Sikandara, District Agra) should remain stayed against the applicants pending verification of the compromise.

¶10

Court's answer

Until further orders of this Court, further proceedings of Case No. 37732 of 2024, arising out of Case Crime No. 420 of 2021, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Sikandara, District Agra, shall remain stayed against the applicants.

¶20

Ratio / Principle

The original compromise is to be sent to the court concerned for verification; both parties are directed to appear before the court concerned for verification within four weeks, and the court concerned is to verify the compromise.

¶12

Key takeaways

Learned counsel for the applicants is directed to file a supplementary affidavit annexing the certified copies of the verified compromise and the proceedings of compromise verification.ratio¶15
The case is to be listed as fresh on 22.05.2026.ratio¶19

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Application under Section 528 BNSS (Allahabad High Court, Sanjay Kumar Pachori, J., order dated February 5, 2026): Applicants and opposite party no. 2 reported settlement of their dispute arising out of offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 IPC by compromise deed dated 04.09.2025 (Annexure-4). The Court directed the Office to send the original compromise to the court concerned for verification, directed both parties to appear before the court concerned for verification within four weeks, and directed the applicants' counsel to file a supplementary affidavit with certified copies of the verified compromise and verification proceedings. Until further orders, further proceedings of Case No. 37732 of 2024, arising out of Case Crime No. 420 of 2021, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Sikandara, District Agra, were stayed against the applicants. Case listed fresh on 22.05.2026. Interlocutory order; no final disposal, no precedent discussed.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 3432 of 2026

¶3

Shailu @ Shailendra And 3 Others

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

	Versus
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Rajeev Kumar, Vijay Tripathi
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: Girish Kumar, G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 74

¶7

HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J.

¶8

Sri Girish Kumar, Advocate has filed his vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record.

¶9

Heard Sri Rajeev Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Girish Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State.

¶10

Learned counsel for both the parties submitted that parties have settled their dispute arising out of offence punishable under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C. on the basis of compromise dated 04.09.2025. Original compromise deed is on record as Annexure-4 to the affidavit.

¶11

Office is directed to send the original compromise to court concerned immediately for vferification after retaining the photostat copy of the same.

¶12

Both the parties are directed to appear before the court concerned for verification within four weeks from today.

¶13

Court concerned is directed to verify the same.

¶14

In view of above, office is directed to send original copy of the compromise deed to the court concerned for verification.

¶15

Learned counsel for the applicants is directed to file supplementary affidavit annexing the certified copies of verified compromise and

¶16

NA528 No. 3432 of 2026

¶17

¶18

proceedings of compromise verification.

¶19

List this case as fresh on 22.05.2026.

¶20

Until further orders of this Court, further proceedings of the Case No.37732 of 2024, arising out of Case Crime No.420 of 2021, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C., Police Station- Sikandara, DistrictAgra, shall remain stayed against the applicants.

¶21

(Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.)

¶22

February 5, 2026

¶23

Virendra

¶24

Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shailu @ Shailendra and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shailu @ Shailendra and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shankar and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Rammilan Pandey and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Wajid Ali and Another vs State of U.P.

Rajabeti and 3 Others vs State of Up and Another

Jagpal Singh vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Deepak Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another