Disposed¶17

Shadab and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC12 Jan 2026NA528/26166/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Padam Narain Mishra J.; Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 26166 of 2025; Shadab v. State of U.P.; compromise dated 27.09.2024; offences under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506, 427 I.P.C.; verification of compromise by Trial Court; supplementary affidavit; appearance within four weeks; listed after six weeks; interim order extended till next date of listing; order dated January 12, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Interlocutory directions: compromise deed to be forwarded to the court concerned and verified by the Trial Court; parties to appear within four weeks; supplementary affidavit to be filed; matter listed after six weeks; interim order, if any, extended till the next date of listing. ¶17

Shadab and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶17

Issue for consideration

Whether the application under Section 528 BNSS, founded on the parties' claimed settlement of offences under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 and 427 I.P.C. by compromise dated 27.09.2024, should proceed by way of verification of the compromise by the concerned court/Trial Court.

¶11

Court's answer

The Office was directed to send the copy of the compromise deed to the court concerned for verification.

¶12

Ratio / Principle

Both parties were directed to appear before the concerned court within four weeks.

¶13

Key takeaways

The Trial Court concerned was directed to verify the compromise.ratio¶14
The applicants were directed to file a supplementary affidavit annexing the verification of the compromise as well as the proceedings till the next date of listing.ratio¶15
The matter was ordered to be listed after six weeks.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Hon'ble Padam Narain Mishra, J.), Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 26166 of 2025 — Shadab And 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another, order dated January 12, 2026: On learned counsel for the applicants stating that the parties had settled their disputes relating to offences punishable under Sections 452, 323, 504, 506 and 427 I.P.C. by a compromise dated 27.09.2024 (on record), the Court directed the Office to send the copy of the compromise deed to the court concerned for verification, directed both parties to appear before the concerned court within four weeks, directed the Trial Court concerned to verify the compromise, and directed the applicants to file a supplementary affidavit annexing the verification of the compromise and proceedings till the next date of listing. Matter listed after six weeks; interim order, if any, extended till the next date of listing.

Shadab and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shadab and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Smt. Pancho and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Smt. Rona and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mahesh and 6 Others vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Smt Sarvesh and 4 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Shabir Malik vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashish Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another