Disposed¶17

Tarachand v. State of U.P.Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko.

Allahabad HC13 Apr 2026NA528/1425/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Keywords: Section 528 BNSS application; single/common bail bond across multiple FIRs; one personal bond and two sureties accepted for four cases; release on bail; reliance on Supreme Court direction in Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky v. State of U.P., SLP(C) No. 8914-8915 of 2018 (29.10.2018); AGA no dispute; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Brij Raj Singh, J.; disposed of 13 April 2026.

What did the court decide?

Trial court directed to accept one personal bond and two sureties in all four cases mentioned in paragraph-6 of the application and to release the applicant on bail. ¶17

Tarachand vs State of U.P.Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1425 of 2026

Tarachand

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P.Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)

¶7

Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vayu Nandan Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 15

¶9

HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶11

The present application under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. has been filed seeking a direction to the court concerned to accept a personal bond and two sureties in all four cases mentioned in paragraph-6 of the memo of application.

¶12

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is involved in four cases and has been granted bail, but he is unable to provide separate bail bonds and sureties in all cases. He, therefore, prays that trial court may be directed to accept the same bail bond and sureties in all four cases mentioned in paragraph-6of the memo of application. In support of his submission, he has placed reliance upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Cri) No.8914-8915 of 2018, Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. State of U.P., dated 29.10.2018 to establish that the Supreme Court in the aforesaid case has directed to accept one personal bond and two sureties for all cases.

¶13

Learned AGA does not dispute the aforesaid legal proposition.

¶14

Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the dictum of the Supreme Court in this regard, the trial court is directed to accept one personal bond and two sureties to its satisfaction in all the four cases

¶15

NA528 No. 1425 of 2026

¶16

¶17

mentioned in paragraph-6 of the application and release the applicant on bail.

¶18