Vinay Kushwaha vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Smt. Kanaklata Singh and Sri Vinay Kumar Dubey, advocates, have put in appearance by way of filing vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2 and the same is taken on record.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the applicants, Smt. Kanaklata Singh and Sri Vinay Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 , learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶12

Instant application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. (now under Section 528 B.N.S.S.) has been filed with prayer for quashing of the entire criminal proceedings of Case No. 51385 of 2025 (State Versus Vinay Kushwaha) initiated against the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned charge sheet dated 23.04.2025 arising out of Case Crime No. 114 of 2025, under Sections 69, 115(2), 352, 351(3) BNS, 2023, District – Lucknow, as well as the cognizance order dated 15.05.2025 passed by the Special CJM (Custom), Lucknow on the basis of compromise done between the petitioner and opposite party no. 2 on dated 17.03.2026, so far as it relates with the petitioner, pending in the court concerned.

¶13

Learned counsel appearing for the applicants submits that the applicants are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the instant case. He next added that under some misunderstanding, the instant F.I.R. has been lodged against the applicants and thereafter, the parties have amicably compromised

¶14

NA528 No. 1202 of 2026

¶15

2

¶16

their dispute. The compromise deed has been reduced in writing on 17.03.2026, which has been annexed as annexure no. 5 to the instant application. He next added that now there is no grievance in between the parties with each other and the criminal proceedings against the applicants are the futile exercise as there is no fate of trial and that is amount to harassment of the applicants and thus, the criminal proceedings against the applicants may be quashed.

¶17

On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties has supported the version of the learned counsel for the applicants and submits that the parties have settled their dispute amicably through a compromise deed and there is no further grievance of the opposite parties against the present applicants and the criminal proceedings against the applicants may be dropped.

¶18

Learned A.G.A. appearing for the State has no objection to the contentions aforesaid.

¶19

Now whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the court below as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court.

¶20

Accordingly, this application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if any such compromise is filed before it, it shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court and the compromise will be made part of the record.

¶21

The court in that scenario will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise and it will be open to the applicants to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings.

¶22

For a period of three months, the proceedings initiated in pursuance of the aforesaid Case Crime No. 114 of 2025, under Sections 69, 115(2), 352, 351(3) BNS, 2023, District – Lucknow shall remain stayed so far as applicants are concerned.

¶23

The trial Court is directed to examine the fact that whether all the parties

¶24

NA528 No. 1202 of 2026

¶25

3

¶26

against whom the chargesheet was filed, the party in the compromise and in this respect, it shall also sent a report along with the verification order.

¶27

Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the learned counsel for the applicants, if any, after taking the photocopy of the same.

¶28

(Shree Prakash Singh,J.)

¶29

March 26, 2026

¶30

Raj

¶31

Digitally signed by :- RAJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vinay Kushwaha v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinay Kushwaha v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Kumar Yadav vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Civil Sectt. Lko. and Another

Mohd.Yahya Alias Yahya vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and Another

Shreyash @ Shreyansh Singh vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. U.P. and Another

Vivek @ Vivek Kumar and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another

Mohd. Aslam vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko.

Pratap Singh vs State of U.P. through Secretary Home Department Civil Secretariat and another