Disposed¶12

Vinit and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC16 Apr 2026NA528/11484/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 11484 of 2026; compromise between parties pending verification; direction to ACJM Court No. 1, Aligarh to verify compromise within four weeks; Registrar (Compliance) to serve order within four working days; interim protection from coercive action till next listing (week commencing 18.5.2026); Case No. 2806 of 2022 / Case Crime No. 132 of 2016; Sections 147, 363, 366, 323, 506 IPC; PS Atrauli, District Aligarh.

What did the court decide?

Interim protection: no coercive action against the applicants till the next date of listing; compromise directed to be verified by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Aligarh within four weeks; matter listed in the week commencing 18.5.2026. ¶12

Vinit and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶12

Issue for consideration

Whether the application under Section 528 BNSS concerning Case No. 2806 of 2022 (Case Crime No. 132 of 2016, PS Atrauli, District Aligarh) should be adjudicated on the basis of the compromise said to have been entered into between the parties, and whether the applicants should meanwhile be protected from coercive action.

¶6

Court's answer

The Court directed the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Aligarh to verify the compromise within four weeks in the presence of both parties and report, so that the matter may be adjudicated on the basis of the verification report.

¶7

Ratio / Principle

The Registrar (Compliance), Allahabad High Court, was directed to ensure service of the order upon the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Aligarh within the next four working days and, after obtaining the verification report, place it on record.

¶8

Key takeaways

As an interim measure, till the next date of listing, no coercive action shall be initiated against the applicants in pursuance of Case No. 2806 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No. 132 of 2016.ratio¶12

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Saurabh Srivastava, J.), Application U/S 528 BNSS No. 11484 of 2026, Vinit and 3 others v. State of U.P. and another, decided April 16, 2026. Counsel for the applicants stated that the parties had entered into a compromise, which had been preferred before the concerned court and was pending verification. The Court directed the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Aligarh to verify the compromise within four weeks in the presence of both parties and report, so that the matter could be adjudicated on the basis of the verification report; the Registrar (Compliance) was directed to ensure service of the order within the next four working days. Till the next date of listing (week commencing 18.5.2026), no coercive action was to be initiated against the applicants in Case No. 2806 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime No. 132 of 2016 under Sections 147, 363, 366, 323 and 506 IPC, PS Atrauli, District Aligarh.

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 11484 of 2026

¶2

Versus Vinit And 3 Others	.....Applicant(s)
State of U.P. and Another	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Vijay Bahadur
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶3

Court No. - 77

¶4

HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶6

In respect of merit of the matter, it has been submitted by learned counsel for applicants that both the parties entered into compromise and the same has already been preferred before learned court concerned and the same is still pending to be verified by same court.

¶7

Considering the submissions extended by learned counsel for applicants, learned court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court no. 1, Aligarh is directed to verify the aforesaid compromise within four weeks from today in presence of both the parties and report the same so that the matter may be adjudicated on the basis of the verification report.

¶8

Registrar (Compliance), Allahabad High Court, is hereby directed to ensure service of this order upon learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court no. 1, Aligarh within next four working days and after seeking verification report the same may be placed in record.

¶9

List in week commencing 18.5.2026.

¶10

NA528 No. 11484 of 2026

¶11

¶12

Till the next date of listing, no coercive action shall be initiated against the applicants herein in pursuance to Case no. 2806 of 2022 arising out of Case Crime no. 132 of 2016 under sections 147, 363, 366, 323 and 506 IPC, PS- Atrauli, District Aligarh.

¶13

April 16, 2026

¶14

Shaswat

¶15

(Saurabh Srivastava,J.)

¶16

Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vinit and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vinit and 3 Others v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shakeel Ahmad vs State of Up and Another

Narendra and 5 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Surendra Nath Rai vs State of U.P. and Another

Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Nigam and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Manoj Kumar Dwivedi Vs State of U.P. and Others

Ravi Kana vs State of Up and 2 Others