Disposed¶15

Shanu v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC17 Feb 2026NA528/11247/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11247 of 2025; Shanu v. State of U.P. and Another; single judge (Padam Narain Mishra, J.); joint submission of settlement by compromise dated 01.04.2025 for offences under Section 326 (G) BNS; directions for verification of compromise by Trial Court; appearance within four weeks; supplementary affidavit; listed fresh after six weeks; interim order extended; decision dated February 17, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Interim order, if any, extended till the next date of listing; compromise deed sent to the court concerned for verification; both parties to appear before the concerned court within four weeks; applicants to file supplementary affidavit annexing verification of compromise and proceedings; matter to be put up as fresh after six weeks. ¶15

Shanu vs State of U.P. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶15

Issue for consideration

Whether the compromise dated 01.04.2025, by which the parties settled their disputes relating to offences punishable under Section 326 (G) BNS, should be verified by the court concerned/Trial Court, and what consequential directions should issue.

¶10

Court's answer

Office is directed to send the copy of the compromise deed to the court concerned for verification.

¶10

Ratio / Principle

Both the parties are directed to appear before the concerned court within four weeks.

¶11

Key takeaways

The Trial Court concerned is directed to verify the compromise.ratio¶12
Applicants are directed to file a supplementary affidavit annexing the verification of the compromise as well as the proceedings till the next date of listing.ratio¶13
The matter is to be put up as fresh after six weeks.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Application under Section 528 BNSS (No. 11247 of 2025), High Court of Judicature at Allahabad (Court No. 82), decided February 17, 2026 by Padam Narain Mishra, J. Learned counsel for both parties jointly submitted that the parties had settled their disputes relating to offences punishable under Section 326 (G) BNS by a compromise dated 01.04.2025, which is on record. The Court directed the Office to send the copy of the compromise deed to the court concerned for verification, directed both parties to appear before the concerned court within four weeks, and directed the Trial Court concerned to verify the compromise. Applicants were directed to file a supplementary affidavit annexing the verification of the compromise and the proceedings till the next date of listing. The matter was ordered to be put up as fresh after six weeks, and any interim order was extended till the next date of listing.

Shanu v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shanu v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Bhoop Singh vs State of U.P. and Another

Sourab Ali Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ghanendra Patel vs State of U.P. and Another

Krishna Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another

Kallu Shukla and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another

Arun Kumar and 3 Others vs State of U.P. and Another