Revisionist sought withdrawal of defective criminal revision against a Family Court order in a Section 125 CrPC maintenance case. The revision was dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 264 of 2025
| Mohd. Yunus | Versus | .....Revisionist(s) |
|---|---|---|
| State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Others |
Home Lko. And 2 | .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Revisionist(s) | : Upendra Kumar Kumar Vikram |
Sagar, Pawneesh |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 27
HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.
(Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.)
April 23, 2026
Mohd. Sharif
Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others
Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
