Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Rameshchandra Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

Home
Allahabad HC
2026
Rameshchandra Vs State of U.P. and 3 OthersRameshchandra v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Dismissed¶21

Rameshchandra v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC15 Mar 2026CRLRD/1486/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court (Court No. 86), Harvir Singh, J. — Rameshchandra v. State of U.P. and 3 Others, Criminal Revision Defective (CRLRD) No. 1486 of 2024 — delay condonation application dismissed (decided March 16, 2026) because the revisionist failed to comply with the Court's order dated 11.9.2025 requiring filing of certified copies of impugned Family Court, Jaunpur orders dated 5.9.2023 and 5.8.2024; revisionist's willful avoidance of proceedings noted; no order passed on the revision. Counsel: Anurag Yadav, Dinesh Kumar Patel, Ray Sahab Yadav, Yashwant Pratap Singh for revisionist; G.A./A.G.A. for State.

What did the court decide?

In this Court's earlier order dated 11.9.2025, the conduct of the revisionist-husband was held not to be reasonable, it appearing that he willfully and deliberately avoided participating in the legal proceedings.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Issue for consideration

Whether the delay in filing the criminal revision should be condoned (Criminal Misc. Delay Condonation Application). +1 more

Court's answer

The delay condonation application is dismissed: the revisionist failed to comply with the order dated 11.9.2025 and is himself responsible for his default.

Ratio / Principle

In this Court's earlier order dated 11.9.2025, the conduct of the revisionist-husband was held not to be reasonable, it appearing that he willfully and deliberately avoided participating in the legal proceedings.

Key takeaways

Since the delay condonation application is dismissed, no further order is required to be passed on the criminal revision.ratio¶23

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Criminal Revision (Defective) No. 1486 of 2024 — Delay condonation application — Revisionist failed to comply with this Court's order dated 11.9.2025 directing him to file certified copies of the impugned orders dated 5.9.2023 and 5.8.2024 of the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Jaunpur — revisionist's conduct of willfully and deliberately avoiding participation in the proceedings earlier held unreasonable and his default self-inflicted — delay condonation application dismissed; consequently, no order passed on the revision; consigned to record (Harvir Singh, J., March 16, 2026).

A

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 1486 of 2024

Rameshchandra

.....Revisionist(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Anurag Yadav, Dinesh Kumar Patel, Ray Sahab Yadav, Yashwant Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 86

HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J.

Order on:- Criminal Misc. Delay Condonation Application.

List revised.

Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State.

This court vide order dated 11.9.2025 passed the following order;

" Order on Criminal Misc. (Exemption) Application No. 1 of 2024

1. Case called out in the revised call. None is present for the revisionist. However, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.

2. The present revision has been filed by the revisionist against the impugned orders dated 5.9.2023 and 5.8.2024 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Jaunpur.

3. The revisionist has also filed an exemption application seeking that he may be exempted to file the certified copy of the impugned orders.

4. On a perusal of the impugned order dated 5.9.2023 in paragraph no. 3, it appears that the revisionist did not appear and an ex-parte order was passed against him. Thereafter the revisionist appeared and the ex-parte order was recalled. Later on, the revisionist filed his reply and again absent, hence learned Additional Principal Judge was constrained to pass ex-parte order against him, in accordance with law.

5. In view of the above, the conduct of the revisionist-husband is not appeared to be reasonable. It is appeared that he willfully and deliberately avoided to participate in

CRLRD No. 1486 of 2024

2

legal proceeding.

6. Accordingly, the exemption application is dismissed. The revisionist is directed to file impugned certified copy of the orders, failing which an appropriate order may be passed.

7. List peremptorily after one month. "

Under the circumstances, the revisionist failed to comply with the order dated 11.9.2025, therefore the revisionist himself is responsible for his default. Hence, the delay condonation application is hereby dismissed.

Order on Criminal Revision

As delay condonation application is dismissed, no further order is required to pass order on the revision.

Cosign to record.

(Harvir Singh,J.)

March 16, 2026

Gss

Digitally signed by :- GIRAJA SHANKER SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Issues for consideration

2 issues framed by the court

AI extract

1.
Whether the delay in filing the criminal revision should be condoned (Criminal Misc. Delay Condonation Application).¶6
The court held
The delay condonation application is dismissed: the revisionist failed to comply with the order dated 11.9.2025 and is himself responsible for his default.ratio¶21
2.
Whether the revisionist should be exempted from filing the certified copy of the impugned orders (decided by this Court's earlier order dated 11.9.2025).¶13
The court held
In this Court's earlier order dated 11.9.2025, the conduct of the revisionist-husband was held not to be reasonable, it appearing that he willfully and deliberately avoided participating in the legal proceedings.ratio¶15

Procedural history

How this case reached the court

AI extract

Order under challenge
Impugned orders dated 5.9.2023 and 5.8.2024 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Jaunpur, challenged in this criminal revision.¶12
learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Jaunpur · 5.9.2023 and 5.8.2024
Prior proceeding
Before the Family Court, an ex-parte order was passed against the revisionist for non-appearance; it was recalled on his appearance; after he filed a reply and was again absent, a further ex-parte order was passed against him in accordance with law.¶14
Prior proceeding
By order dated 11.9.2025, this Court dismissed the revisionist's exemption application (seeking exemption from filing the certified copy of the impugned orders) and directed him to file certified copies of the impugned orders, listing the case peremptorily after one month.¶19
Prior proceeding
The revisionist failed to comply with this Court's order dated 11.9.2025 and is himself responsible for the default.¶21

Parties & counsel

AI extract

applicant
Rameshchandra¶3
Anurag Yadav, Dinesh Kumar Patel, Ray Sahab Yadav, Yashwant Pratap Singh
respondent
State Of U.P. And 3 Others¶4
G.A., A.G.A.

Coram

AI extract

Harvir Singhauthor¶5

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Allahabad HC
Decided on: 15 Mar 2026 · March
Registered: 11 Sept 2024
Case no.: CRLRD/1486/2024
CNR: UPHC014566562024
Bench: Harvir Singh
Case type: CRIMINAL REVISION DEFECTIVE

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Harvir Singh

Urmila and Another vs State of U.P. and 6 Others
13 Mar 2026
Nilesh Yadav vs State of U.P.
12 Mar 2026
Sanjeev Kumar @ Sanjay vs State of U.P.
12 Mar 2026
Ravendra Singh Vs State of Up and Another
15 Mar 2026
Manoj Kumar Vs State of U.P.
15 Mar 2026
Shesh Mani Maurya Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others
15 Mar 2026

Cite this judgement

Rameshchandra v. State of U.P. and 3 Others, CRLRD/1486/2024 (ALL), decided on 15 March 2026.

The Allahabad High Court publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Procedural history4

Impugned orders dated 5.9.2023 and 5.8.2024 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Jaunpur, challenged in this criminal revision.learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Jaunpur · 5.9.2023 and 5.8.2024
Before the Family Court, an ex-parte order was passed against the revisionist for non-appearance; it was recalled on his appearance; after he filed a reply and was again absent, a further ex-parte order was passed against him in accordance with law.
By order dated 11.9.2025, this Court dismissed the revisionist's exemption application (seeking exemption from filing the certified copy of the impugned orders) and directed him to file certified copies of the impugned orders, listing the case peremptorily after one month.

View full history

Bench / Coram

Harvir Singh

Parties & counsel