Rambahadur Singh v. State of U.P. and 7 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5795 of 2026 Court No. - 88 HON'BLE SANJIV KUMAR, J. Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the revisionist, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. This Criminal Revision under Section 438/448 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha
Disposed 3 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 5795 of 2026
Rambahadur Singh
.....Revisionist(s)
| Versus | |
|---|---|
| State Of U.P. And 7 Others | .....Opposite Party(s) |
| Counsel for Revisionist(s) : |
Santosh Kukmar Tiwari |
| Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : |
G.A. |
Court No. - 88
HON'BLE SANJIV KUMAR, J.
Heard Mr. Santosh Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the revisionist, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
This Criminal Revision under Section 438/448 of Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short 'BNSS') has been filed against impugned order dated 22.08.2026 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.14, Shahjahanpur in Criminal Misc. Case No. 720 of 2026, Police Station Kotwali, District Shahjahanpur, whereby the learned Magistrate has rejected the application filed on behalf of the revisionist under Section 173(4) BNSS.
Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the impugned order is not sustainable in the eye of law because the offence was committed by the accused and the Trial Court has rejected the application on the ground that it has no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the application, as such, the same is liable to be quashed.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLR/5795/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court